Unrepresented in Court: The Numbers Behind the Access to Justice Gap in England and Wales

In 80% of private family law proceedings in England and Wales, at least one party now appears without legal representation. In 39% of cases, neither party has a lawyer — triple the figure recorded in 2013. These are not fringe cases or vexatious litigants. They are parents in custody disputes, tenants facing eviction, individuals challenging benefit decisions, and people navigating the immigration system. They are, in the language of the courts, litigants in person.

Disclosure: This article is published by Search the Law, a commercial legal research platform. Where the article references legal research tools, readers should be aware of that connection. The analysis in this article is based on published government statistics, parliamentary reports, and independent reviews cited in full at the end.

This article sets out what the published data shows: how many people are unrepresented, which areas of law are most affected, what happened to the legal aid system that was designed to prevent this, and how the providers who remain are managing with the funding they have.

How Many People Go to Court Without a Lawyer?

The Ministry of Justice publishes quarterly statistics on representation in family courts. The most recent data, covering July to September 2025, confirms a pattern that has been widening since 2013.

In private law children proceedings — disputes between parents over where a child lives and how much time they spend with each parent — only 19% of cases now have both parties legally represented. That figure was 41% in 2013. The remaining cases are split between those where one party has representation and one does not (42%), and those where neither party has any legal representation at all (39%).

The trend is not confined to family law. In housing possession proceedings, the defendant — typically the tenant — is unrepresented in the vast majority of cases. The Renters’ Rights Act 2025, which abolishes Section 21 “no-fault” evictions and moves all possession claims to grounds-based proceedings under Section 8, is expected to increase the complexity of housing cases heard in court. Tenants who previously had no defence to a Section 21 notice will now need to understand and respond to specific grounds for possession — a process that benefits significantly from legal advice. (For more on the Act and what it changes, see our earlier analysis: How the Renters’ Rights Act Changes Section 21 Evictions.) In employment tribunals, claimants bringing unfair dismissal or discrimination claims frequently appear without legal assistance. In immigration tribunals, applicants challenging deportation or asylum decisions face Home Office lawyers while representing themselves.

Reliable data on the total number of litigants in person across all court jurisdictions does not exist. The National Audit Office has criticised the Ministry of Justice for the limitations of its data collection, noting that most available statistics concern the family courts alone. The true scale of self-representation across civil, family, and tribunal proceedings is almost certainly larger than the published figures suggest.

Why Are So Many People Unrepresented in Court?

Research consistently identifies the same primary reason: cost. Approximately 75–80% of litigants in person appear without representation because they cannot afford legal fees, not because they have chosen to manage their case alone. The average hourly rate for a solicitor in England ranges from £247 to £579 depending on experience and location. A contested family law matter that reaches a final hearing can easily generate legal costs of £15,000–£30,000 per party. For most households, that is not a realistic option.

Until 2013, the legal aid system was designed to bridge this gap. Civil legal aid provided publicly funded representation to individuals who met the financial eligibility criteria and whose cases fell within scope. The system was not perfect — waiting times were long, fee rates were low, and geographical coverage was uneven — but it meant that a significant proportion of people who could not afford a solicitor could still access one.

The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, known as LASPO, changed this. When it took effect on 1 April 2013, it removed entire areas of law from the scope of legal aid. Welfare benefits, employment, most housing matters (other than those involving immediate risk of homelessness), most immigration cases (other than asylum), and private family law (other than cases involving domestic abuse or child protection) were all taken out of scope. The stated aim was to reduce the legal aid budget by £350 million per year.

The reduction in scope was immediate and measurable. The number of legal aid cases providing early legal advice dropped from almost one million in 2009/10 to approximately 130,000 in 2021/22. The 80% unrepresented figure in family courts follows directly from this change: private law children proceedings were taken out of scope, and most parents in those proceedings simply could not replace publicly funded representation with privately funded solicitors.

What Happened to Legal Aid Providers?

The providers who deliver legal aid — solicitors’ firms, law centres, and not-for-profit advice agencies — have experienced a contraction that the published data tracks in detail.

According to the most recent Legal Aid Statistics (October to December 2025), there were 1,973 providers and 3,303 offices contracted to deliver legal aid services across England and Wales at the start of December 2025. For civil legal aid specifically, 1,270 providers operated from 2,182 offices. For criminal legal aid, 1,270 providers operated from 1,596 offices.

These numbers represent what remains after more than a decade of attrition. Between September 2018 and March 2023, the number of housing legal aid providers fell by 20%. Welfare benefits providers fell by 27%. Immigration and asylum providers — where over 30% of those given contracts in 2018 had stopped doing legal aid work by 2023 — saw the steepest decline. Mental health providers fell by 21%.

The number of advice agencies and law centres doing early legal help work has fallen by 59% since 2009/10.

The reasons are financial. Civil legal aid fee rates have not kept pace with inflation. In real terms, they are now approximately half what they were 28 years ago. A housing solicitor conducting a possession defence on legal aid is paid at rates that were set in the late 1990s, while their office rent, professional indemnity insurance, practising certificate fees, and staff costs have all increased substantially.

Lord Bellamy’s 2021 independent review of criminal legal aid found that fee schemes did not accurately reflect the work undertaken by providers and recommended an overall fee increase of at least 15%. The government has committed to a cumulative 24% uplift for criminal legal aid solicitors, but the increase is being staged: a first 12% was implemented following the review, and a further 12% was announced in December 2024, with 6% expected after consultation this financial year and the remaining 6% by the end of this parliament. The full uplift has not yet taken effect. For civil legal aid, fee uplifts for housing and immigration work were welcomed but described by practitioners as insufficient to future-proof those parts of the sector. An analysis of historical fee levels suggested that a 95% increase would be required to restore rates to their 1996 equivalents in real terms.

The providers who remain are doing more with less. Law centres operate with small teams covering multiple areas of law. Solicitors’ firms cross-subsidise legal aid work from privately paying clients. Not-for-profit advice agencies rely on a combination of legal aid contracts, local authority grants, and charitable funding — each with its own reporting requirements, contract terms, and renewal uncertainty.

In criminal legal aid, the sustainability pressures are acute. Since 2017, more than 1,400 criminal duty solicitors have left the sector. One in eight duty solicitor schemes — the rotas that ensure someone is available to advise defendants at police stations and magistrates’ courts — is now assessed as at risk of being unsustainable.

Where Are the Legal Aid Deserts?

The geographical distribution of remaining providers is not even. Areas where no legal aid provider operates for a particular category of law have become known as “legal aid deserts.”

The Law Society’s data shows that 25.3 million people — 42% of the population of England and Wales — do not have access to a local legal aid provider for housing advice. That figure has grown by 5% since 2019. For community care law, which covers services for disabled and elderly people, the coverage gap is wider still: more than 42 million people, nearly 70% of the population, have no local provider.

In February 2024, the National Audit Office published a report on the government’s management of legal aid that examined the provider market in detail. It found that the Ministry of Justice had been unable to appoint providers for contracts to provide emergency housing advice in specialist courts. Between 2018 and 2020, the Legal Aid Agency ran retendering exercises for 14 schemes providing on-the-day housing advice at court, but no provider could be found across eight of those schemes, covering 11 courts. People arriving at court to defend possession proceedings at those locations had no access to legal advice on the day.

The NAO concluded that the Ministry of Justice had been “slow and reactive” in responding to sustainability risks in the legal aid market and lacked the data needed to identify emerging problems before they became crises.

How Does Self-Representation Affect the Courts?

The increase in litigants in person has changed how courts operate. A survey conducted for the judiciary found that 87% of respondents reported that the increase in self-represented parties had a detrimental impact on the ability of family and civil courts to deliver justice fairly, effectively, and efficiently.

The effects are structural. Hearings take longer because judges must explain procedure, identify the legal issues, and ensure that unrepresented parties understand what is happening — responsibilities that would ordinarily fall to their solicitor or barrister. Case management is more difficult because litigants in person may not understand directions, may file documents late or in the wrong format, or may not appreciate which evidence is relevant.

The judiciary has responded with guidance. The Equal Treatment Bench Book, updated in February 2026, includes a dedicated chapter on litigants in person and lay representatives. In March 2026, the judiciary published a new guide specifically for unrepresented parties on preparing court bundles for family proceedings — acknowledging that the bundle preparation process, which lawyers manage as a matter of routine, is a significant procedural obstacle for people representing themselves.

None of this is a criticism of litigants in person. The courts have consistently recognised that self-represented parties are held to the same procedural standards as those with lawyers, but that reasonable accommodations must be made to ensure they can participate meaningfully. The challenge is systemic: the volume of unrepresented parties has grown beyond what the system was designed to accommodate, and neither the court service nor the legal aid system has been resourced to meet it.

What Free Legal Help Is Available?

For people who find themselves navigating the legal system without representation, several publicly funded and charitable resources provide assistance.

Citizens Advice operates a national advice service covering most areas of civil law, with local bureaux offering face-to-face appointments. Their helpline is available on 0800 144 8848.

Law centres provide free legal advice and representation in social welfare law — housing, welfare benefits, employment, immigration, and community care. The Law Centres Network directory at lawcentres.org.uk lists centres by location.

Shelter provides specialist housing advice, including representation in possession proceedings, on 0808 800 4444.

The Bar Pro Bono Unit (now Advocate) matches people who cannot afford legal representation with volunteer barristers for court hearings.

The Personal Support Unit operates in courts across England and Wales, providing practical and emotional support to people attending court without a lawyer. They do not give legal advice but help with navigating the court building, understanding paperwork, and managing the stress of proceedings.

GOV.UK provides procedural guides for representing yourself in different types of court and tribunal proceedings.

For legal research — understanding the law that applies to a specific situation, finding relevant cases, and checking whether an authority is still good law — Search the Law provides free access to 17 official UK legal databases, including court judgments, tribunal decisions, legislation, and Hansard. The citation network shows how cases have been treated by subsequent decisions, allowing unrepresented parties and advisers to verify the current status of any authority they intend to rely on.

The Access to Justice Gap: Where Things Stand

The published data tells a clear story. Legal aid scope was reduced in 2013. Provider numbers fell. Geographical coverage contracted. Fee rates did not keep pace with costs. The providers who remained absorbed higher workloads at lower real-terms pay. The number of people arriving at court without representation increased year on year. Courts adapted their procedures but were not resourced for the change.

The people working within the legal aid system — solicitors, caseworkers, advisers, and support staff — continue to provide representation and advice under funding constraints that have been well documented by the NAO, the Law Society, the Bar Council, and successive parliamentary committees. The work they do prevents cases from escalating, keeps people in their homes, protects children, and ensures that defendants have someone beside them when they face the state. They do it at fee rates that have not been updated in real terms for nearly three decades.

The 80% figure in family courts is not an abstract statistic. It represents parents making decisions about their children’s lives in proceedings where the other side may have a barrister and they do not. It represents tenants defending possession claims without understanding the grounds on which they are being evicted. It represents people for whom the justice system exists in theory but is functionally inaccessible in practice.

Understanding the law that applies to your situation is the first step. It does not replace legal representation — but for the millions of people who do not have that option, it is not nothing. It is the difference between walking into court knowing what the authorities say and walking in hoping for the best.

---

Search the Law is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. The information in this article is for research and informational purposes only. If you need legal advice, contact a solicitor, your local Citizens Advice (0800 144 8848), Shelter (0808 800 4444), or your local law centre (lawcentres.org.uk).

---

Sources:

• Ministry of Justice, Family Court Statistics Quarterly: July to September 2025 (GOV.UK)
• Ministry of Justice / Legal Aid Agency, Legal Aid Statistics England and Wales: October to December 2025 (GOV.UK)
• National Audit Office, Government’s Management of Legal Aid (February 2024)
• House of Commons Library, Litigants in Person: The Rise of the Self-Represented Litigant in Civil and Family Cases in England and Wales (Research Briefing SN07113)
• Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, Access to Justice: Legal Aid and Services (POST-PN-0758)
• The Law Society, Civil Legal Aid: Millions Still Without Access to Justice
• The Law Society, Perfect Storm Brewing in Family Courts as Rising Numbers Represent Themselves
• Law Gazette, Pay Rise for Legal Aid Lawyers ‘Not Big Enough’ to Rebuild Housing and Immigration Sectors
• Judiciary of England and Wales, Equal Treatment Bench Book (February 2026 update)
• Judiciary of England and Wales, Preparing Court Bundles for Family Proceedings: Guide for Litigants in Person (March 2026)
• Lord Bellamy, Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid (November 2021)
• Renters’ Rights Act 2025 (legislation.gov.uk)